> Apart from compatibility issues [1] I do know there are compatibility issues, however is is rather smooth if you are creating a new script. I do know what "backward compatibility" is.
> I got the speed info from the diagram in the link from the Bugzilla: > http://ariya.ofilabs.com/2014/03/nashorn-the-new-rhino-on-the-block.html This benchmark makes very little sense. Proper benchmarking should involve jmh [1] >Nashorn is NOT always faster than Rhino Well, what if it is faster in 99.9% cases? I mean that we never find a library that will be always faster than Rhino. There always be at lease a case or two where Rhino wins. Does that mean we have to live with Rhino forever? [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/code-tools/jmh/ Vladimir
