On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:28 AM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 5 January 2016 at 22:53, Philippe Mouawad
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I created a bugzilla for this.
>
> However it is not mentioned on the original BZ.
>
> > It is to make release notes clear.
>
> Fixing deprecations should be part of any library version upgrades.
> Otherwise it's not a complete fix.
>
> Fixing deprecations as part of a version upgrade need not (in fact
> should not) be separately documented in changes.xml.
> Indeed it would be more confusing to show deprecation removal
> separately in this case.
>
> [However if deprecations were left over from a previous release, it
> probably would make sense to add a changes record]
>
> > If you keep it open, then do you remove it from changes.xml while we
> indeed
> > changed version and migrated cookiemanager ?
>
> Provided that the work is done before the release is cut, I see no
> reason to remove the text from changes.xml temporarily.
>
I doubt the work will be done before next release unless you want to delay
it for months:
- As you know the upgrade was init without much progress few months ago
- I fixed the CookieManager and as you can see it took some time and
required 4.5.2
- I analyzed the remaining work and I think it is rather huge, complex
and critical as we need to:
- Recode SlowSocketFactory equivalent
- Recode all the HttpHC4Impl
- Recode SSL socket factory equivalent
But of course if you think it can be fixed easily it in few days , it will
be great and I'll be happy to see it.
>
> >
> >
> > On Tuesday, January 5, 2016, <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57319
> >>
> >> Sebb <[email protected] <javascript:;>> changed:
> >>
> >> What |Removed |Added
> >>
> >>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Resolution|FIXED |---
> >> Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
> >>
> >> --- Comment #4 from Sebb <[email protected] <javascript:;>> ---
> >> There are lots of deprecation warnings still to fix.
> >>
> >> --
> >> You are receiving this mail because:
> >> You reported the bug.
> >> You are on the CC list for the bug.
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cordialement.
> > Philippe Mouawad.
> > Ubik-Ingénierie
> >
> > UBIK LOAD PACK Web Site <http://www.ubikloadpack.com/>
> >
> > UBIK LOAD PACK on TWITTER <https://twitter.com/ubikloadpack>
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
