Hello,
For me, the jump to 3.0 must be done for next version.
Remember: JMeter 2.0.0 was release in 2004, so 12 years ago and 23
versions have been release since!
A lot of works since 2004 on the user interface (the toolbar, sampler
forms, graphical listener, etc.)
A lot of works under the woods, to improve the JMeter internal
performance, the samplers like HTTP request (default HC4), the parallel
resource download, etc)
A lot of works to improve the user experience (like the Regexp tester,
the templates box, the search on the JMeter tree, log pane, OS
integration for copy/paste, POST body for WS request, etc.)
Recently, a lot of works on the website to refresh the design (and logo)
(a lot of this changes will publish on the next release)
IMHO, the bump to JMeter 3.0, exceptionally can not only based on the
new behaviors since the previous version (N-1) or API changes, but we
need to consider the works of all developers since 2004. (and after
change to a new number rules)
Apache JMeter isn't comparable with project like Commons or HTTPClient
on the versions rules. Commons/HC are mainly use as a framework inside
another software (like JMeter). JMeter is mainly use a as end user
software, the API (break/don't break) isn't the alone criteria to change
the versions number. The UI and the engine must be consider to the next
release number.
Last reason to change : The users may be confused with a 2.x version
from 2004 (works only with Java 1.4, some jvm args are now
incompatibles) and a 2.14 version which require Java 7.
Milamber
On 05/01/2016 11:01, sebb wrote:
On 4 January 2016 at 18:23, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote:
First Happy new year 2016 !
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 4:26 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
JMeter does not have a formal policy for major/minor version release
updates.
However historically major veresion changes have been associated with
major changes.
I am proposing to follow what seems to become a standard in versioning
refering to a proposal from a scientist working on the subject.
http://semver.org/ says:
Increment the MAJOR version when you make incompatible API changes,
We are not doing that.
Also other ASF projects such as Commons and HttpClient require major
version bumps when removing deprecated code.
So isn't this what we are doing as we dropped 4 classes corresponding to
deprecated elements. And we will deprecate some more.
But the main idea behind this is that next version contains major features
which I think deserve this change.
What features are you referring to?
I don't think the proposed changes warrant a major version bump.
I don't understand, but if we don't come to an agreement I propose to run a
vote on this although it would be better to avoid it.
On 3 January 2016 at 15:36, Milamber <milam...@apache.org> wrote:
I agree with a new release with a new version number system, and with the
next release to become 3.0.
Before the next release, I would like add the HiDPI (high definition
screen)
for JMeter (for Linux Gnome/GTK and Windows). Currently I works on this.
(my new computer have a 3200x1800 resolution on a 13' screen, JMeter is
very
small with the CrossPlatform Swing UI)
On 03/01/2016 15:08, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
Hi Felix,
Thanks for answer.
I don't think it will be a long hold on the new release, for me we have
these remaining points:
- Integrate HTTPCLIENT 4.5.2 to fix
- 58583 <https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58583>
- 57319
- Finalize tests
- 57804 => Waiting confirmation from Rainer or any other member of
the
team
- Deprecation:
- 58791 => I will do it
- Not mandatory but would be nice:
- 58793
- 58790
- 58792 => I will try to stat it
- 58794 => I will start a discussion on this
That's all for me, but if you see other things feel free to add it.
Thanks
Regards
Philippe M.
@philmdot
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Felix Schumacher <
felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote:
Am 01.01.2016 um 19:14 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
Hi,
Happy new year to the whole team.
Any news on this ?
I have nothing against a 3.0, but I would not like it, if the "big"
version change would lead to a long hold up of a new release.
Regards,
Felix
Thanks
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Following my proposals to deprecate a certain number of elements that
were
approved by 2 commiters and knowing that we have some important new
features in this release, I propose to name next version 3.0 instead
of
2.14.
It would be the occasion to make a big cleanup in all "oldies"
elements
and maybe be even more aggressive in the deprecations/removals.
And starting from there change our release naming to follow this:
- http://semver.org/
This has been mentioned by this thread and I think it's a good idea:
-
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jmeter-dev/201411.mbox/%3CCAFJ7uesG%2BsKiQh_wQ5_iLp%3DJ%2BtSiG5fQ%3D7Pp1CvbJ1kncXo%2B%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
I think in the developers thinking our current naming is not great,
cause
one can think every "major" release we do is a Minor release.
--
Regards
Philippe M.
@philmdot
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
.