Hello,
Frankly I don't understand this discussion:
- LOG (Upper Case) for static is the usual policy that is applied by all
of us since few time
- The guy named it LOGGER, what's the problem except that it does not
suit a particular taste ? :
- It is in UPPERCASE
- It is meaningful
- and if we don't like it, why just not merge it and rename the
variable ?
Finally, the guy here ( Benoit W.) contributed around 100 patches on this
version ! (many very precious),
do you think this kind of big discussion for a Variable naming without a
THANK YOU ! and a HELLO ! is a good way to encourage other contributors ?
I don't think so, and I disagree with such behaviour !
Regards
Philippe
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 7:06 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 18 March 2016 at 17:55, Vladimir Sitnikov
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>Why change log to LOGGER?
> >>It would make more sense to change it to LOG
> >
> > Frankly speaking, I think lowercase log is just perfect.
> > What is the purpose of making LOG shout at you?
> >
> > Isn't log.info(...) self-descriptive enough?
>
> Good point.
> [But if it is to be changed, it should be just upcased.]
>
> On reflection I agree with you that it makes sense to leave "log" as
> lower-case.
>
> For the other constants, using the conventional upper-case is generally
> helpful.
>
> > Vladimir
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
