Thanks Felix. Regarding the social media links the are located at the bottom and not really visible as not above the floating line. I would prefer them to be visible without scrolling. Maybe it could be in About section which we could change :
- to remove "JMeter on Twitter <http://twitter.com/ApacheJMeter>" as it's already in the other links, - Put issues section in Community - Put "Project info at Apache <https://projects.apache.org/project.html?jmeter>" section in Community On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Felix Schumacher < [email protected]> wrote: > Am 30.03.2016 um 20:04 schrieb Felix Schumacher: > >> Am 30.03.2016 um 08:25 schrieb Philippe Mouawad: >> >>> Hi Felix, >>> When do you plan to commit the new logo so that it's used by JMeter site >>> and application ? >>> >> I hope to do so tomorrow. >> > I have committed the changes for the logo. > > The social media links are placed inside a div in nav. I am not sure, > whether it should stay there, or not. Any ideas? > > Felix > > > >> Regards, >> Felix >> >>> Thanks >>> Regards >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:10 AM, Milamber <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Yes that's would be a good choice for update/refresh the JMeter identity >>>> design. >>>> >>>> Milamber >>>> >>>> >>>> On 23/03/2016 22:31, sebb wrote: >>>> >>>> Agreed, let's just go with 6. >>>>> Most people seem happy with it; I don't think anyone is against it. >>>>> >>>>> On 23 March 2016 at 19:36, Philippe Mouawad < >>>>> [email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Thanks Felix. >>>>>> Looks fair to me. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wednesday, March 23, 2016, Felix Schumacher < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 23.03.2016 um 15:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Anybody computed the results ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If every mail counts as a vote (NaveenKumar sent his vote twice and >>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> counted it only once, sebb gave two votes with no preference, so I >>>>>>> counted >>>>>>> both :) then we have two winners 3 and 6. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If I take the preferences into account (first counts as two votes, >>>>>>> second >>>>>>> as one (again sebb counts both times as two)) 6 wins. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The same is true if I take the first three preferences into account >>>>>>> with >>>>>>> 3, 2 and 1 as a factor. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So I guess it is 6. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does anyone else wants to give a formula to calculate a winner? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Felix >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As per the vote through modernballots, logo 6 seems to be the winner: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://modernballots.com/elections/frmtk7nk/view/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But as sebb wrote it is not controlled and people can vote as many >>>>>>>> times >>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>> they want. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Monday, March 14, 2016, NaveenKumar Namachivayam < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 for Number 3 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Marko Vlahovic < >>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 for number 3 too. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> thanks >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Nachiket Kate < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 for number 3. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Am 11.03.2016 um 23:46 schrieb Philippe Mouawad: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Felix has created a new set of Logos for JMeter 3.0. >>>>>>>>>>>> All variants can be seen on >>>>>>>>>>>> http://home.apache.org/~fschumacher/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please start voting. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> jmeter6, jmeter4, jmeter3 (in 3 I would colour TM grey). >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Felix >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 72 hours. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe M. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> NaveenKumar N >>>>>>>>> Visit www.QAInsights.com and www.Testifications.com and >>>>>>>>> www.MyTechCube.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cordialement. >>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >> > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
