On Saturday, April 9, 2016, Andrey Pokhilko <[email protected]> wrote:

> I speak about unknown element.

ok

>
> The plugins market needs no discussion, I'm 70% into implementing it.


In my opinion it should have been discussed but you are free to implement
it in "your" project, it appears it will rely on a commercial 3rd pArty as
plugin hoster.

We are of course free to discuss it within the project and choose a
different way to do it.
I still believe it must be in Core JMeter.



>
> Andrey Pokhilko
>
> On 04/09/2016 11:05 PM, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
> > On Saturday, April 9, 2016, Andrey Pokhilko <[email protected] <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Accepting bets on the discussion result... I'll better spend the time
> >> writing code for "plugins market" than to have long discussions. Sorry,
> >> that's my personal issues.
> >>
> >> For me you got the feature idea right, message transferred, so what to
> >> discuss :)?
> > are you speaking about the plugin market or unknown element ?
> >
> > if first one, what can be discussed is the format and way of working.
> > If unknown element, then it's true dev can start
> >
> >> Andrey Pokhilko
> >>
> >> On 04/09/2016 10:21 PM, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
> >>> what's the problem, let's discuss this in core
> >>>
> >>> On Saturday, April 9, 2016, Andrey Pokhilko <[email protected] <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>>
> >> wrote:
> >>>> So you got the idea right. Unfortunately, this can't be done as
> >>>> third-party plugin, it requires core change.
> >>>>
> >>>> Andrey Pokhilko
> >>>>
> >>>> On 04/09/2016 10:02 PM, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
> >>>>> On Saturday, April 9, 2016, Andrey Pokhilko <[email protected]
> <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
> >> <javascript:;>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> In fact, I'm already working on "plugins repository" feature. So it
> >> will
> >>>>>> be available soon.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> What could be improved in JMeter regarding situation of unknown
> plugin
> >>>>>> in test plan is to still show the test plan, putting some "Unknown
> >> Class
> >>>>>> Element" at the place of unknown classes. That would allow reviewing
> >>>>>> these elements in UI which would be easier than monstrous error
> >> message
> >>>>>> currently shown. Although I'd keep the message. Also the plan with
> >>>>>> "Unknown Element" present wouldn't be available for running. Well,
> >>>>>> another arguable idea from me, tangential to the subject at hand, so
> >>>>>> nevermind :).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I find this idea interesting.
> >>>>> The ideal situation for me would be:
> >>>>> - open the plan
> >>>>> - Show as you propose unknown element for the missing class with
> maybe
> >>>> the
> >>>>> stacktrace in the gui of this unknown element
> >>>>> - when saving the plan, the missing class is not  changed so the
> >> initial
> >>>>> plan is not corrupt
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Andrey Pokhilko
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 04/09/2016 11:56 AM, sebb wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 8 April 2016 at 22:40, Vladimir Sitnikov <
> >>>> [email protected] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>
> >>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Philippe> The idea was interesting because it makes things rather
> >>>>>> simple.
> >>>>>>>> What if we take a step back and consider some kind of "JMeter
> Plugin
> >>>>>> Market"?
> >>>>>>> This is tangential to the subject at hand.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> For instance:
> >>>>>>>> 1) Search & install plugins from within JMeter UI
> >>>>>>> -1; that would add unnecessary classes to memory.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> However it could be stand-alone.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Though I'm not sure how much work it would save compared with the
> >>>>>>> effort of creating and maintaining it. That sounds like a good 3rd
> >>>>>>> party project; it seems OT for JMeter.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 2) If loading a test plan that references not yet installed
> plugins,
> >>>>>>>> JMeter would be able to suggest installing the required ones
> >>>>>>> JMeter only knows what classes the test plan cannot find.
> >>>>>>> Who is going to maintain the database of plugin locations and their
> >>>>>> classes?
> >>>>>>> Who is going to vet the plugins?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> However it might be possible to improve the error messages that are
> >>>>>>> produced when test classes cannot be found.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Vladimir
> >>
>
>

-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.

Reply via email to