On 12 April 2016 at 18:17, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > My opinion is it will be better to merge it for 3.0 because the majority of > my PR are about HTML report. > > And the majority of users will see the HTML report for the first time in > this release and the first impression is very important. > > And if you check my PR you can see:
Sorry, but I don't have time to review the changes. > modification of label to be consistent with other listener and between > tables in HTML report > modification of some axis label to be more accurate (I have add "average" > to avoid user search in documentation which metric is) > fix a bug about encoding accent when the HTML report are generated in a > French OS > > It's details but details are very important in my opinion > > There are PR for other details (one PR to have a better (for me) IHM, > another to have another default column sort (more usefull in my opinion) > > I am planning to fix other details and add some features for 3.1 release (I > have take some free time to fix the previous PR to 3.0 release before to > implement the new one) > > Antonio > > 2016-04-12 15:17 GMT+02:00 sebb <[email protected]>: > >> On 12 April 2016 at 13:50, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > I cannot merge before thursday evening. >> > Anybody else can ? >> > Milamber when do you plan to make the release ? >> > >> > Should we merge those or wait for 3.1 ? >> >> wait for 3.1 >> >> > Regards >> > >> > On Monday, April 11, 2016, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> I have made some PR to allow the user have a better experience with 3.0 >> >> >> >> If it's possible, one of you can check my PR and merge it if it's ok >> before >> >> 3.0 release? >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Antonio >> >> >> >> < >> >> >> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2200-b >> >> > >> >> Garanti >> >> sans virus. www.avast.com >> >> < >> >> >> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-2200-b >> >> > >> >> <#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> >> >> >> >> 2016-04-04 23:14 GMT+02:00 Milamber <[email protected] >> <javascript:;>>: >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On 04/04/2016 14:23, Philippe Mouawad wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> >> >> As it appears there is no pending issue to release a 3.0, any >> volunteer >> >> >> to >> >> >> act as RM for 3.0 ? >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Yes, with great pleasure for this great new version! >> >> > >> >> > I can start a release process next Saturday (or Sunday) >> >> > >> >> > Milamber >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> Regards >> >> >> Philippe >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sunday, April 3, 2016, Philippe Mouawad < >> [email protected] >> >> <javascript:;>> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> As suggested by Felix, I think this enhancement can be delayed to >> next >> >> >>> release following 3.0. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> If so, @sebb and all, can we start the release process ? >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Regards >> >> >>> >> >> >>> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, Philippe Mouawad < >> >> [email protected] <javascript:;> >> >> >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected] >> >> <javascript:;>');>> wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>>> On Saturday, April 2, 2016, sebb <[email protected] <javascript:;>> >> >> wrote: >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> On 1 April 2016 at 23:58, Philippe Mouawad < >> >> [email protected] <javascript:;>> >> >> >>>>> wrote: >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>> It's developed. >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>> I know. >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> Just need to decide which option is best. >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>> Not possible to decide without knowing how expensive the options >> are. >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> the first option (LRU like) is expensive as per Vladimir notes. >> >> >>>> We could reduce cost by dropping every N additions. >> >> >>>> But bear in mind that cost start to be high when we reach the >> limit, >> >> >>>> without it GC would have a cost as memory would keep increasing. >> >> >>>> But it is hard to make a comparison >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Option 2 (warn and stop adding) has nearly 0 overhead >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> As I wrote, that needs to be resolved. >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> But we can delay its integration if needed >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> Regardd >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> On Friday, April 1, 2016, sebb <[email protected] <javascript:;>> >> >> wrote: >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> On 1 April 2016 at 22:37, Philippe Mouawad < >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> [email protected] <javascript:;> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> hello, >> >> >>>>>>>> I think trunk is now ready for a release. >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> I see no pending bug and I think 3.0 is really expected. >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> What about the OOM issue? >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> That either needs to be resolved or postponed. >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> Are you ok to start ? >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> -- >> >> >>>>>>>> Cordialement. >> >> >>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> -- >> >> >>>>>> Cordialement. >> >> >>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>> -- >> >> >>>> Cordialement. >> >> >>>> Philippe Mouawad. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> -- >> >> >>> Cordialement. >> >> >>> Philippe Mouawad. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Cordialement. >> > Philippe Mouawad. >>
