On 19 April 2016 at 01:32, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 17 April 2016 at 18:03, Milamber <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> The second release candidate for JMeter 3.0 (r1739623) has been prepared, >> and your votes are solicited. >> >> This release brings a lot of new features (over 100) and fixes many bugs >> (60). >> >> If you can, some tests of this release candidate (load tests and/or >> functional tests) with Java 7/8 on Linux/Windows/Mac OS on changes are >> welcome. >> >> You can read the New and Noteworthy section with some screenshots to >> illustrate improvements and full list of changes at: >> http://home.apache.org/~milamber/jmeter-3.0RC2/docs/changes.html >> >> JMeter is a Java desktop application designed to load test functional >> behavior and measure performance. The current version is targeted at Java >> 7+. >> >> Archives/hashes/sigs: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jmeter/v3.0_RC2/ > > FTR, the revision is: r13285 > >> RAT report: >> >> http://home.apache.org/~milamber/jmeter-3.0RC2/dist/rat-report-jmeter-3.0RC2.txt >> >> MD5 hashes of archives for this vote: >> >> 8eab13c7c97cae7ad981adce73feaf7c *apache-jmeter-3.0.tgz >> 0375b7ad7fb51698f647ab2d8649b242 *apache-jmeter-3.0.zip >> 792fb612c2a8de5b4352579fcf4d09be *apache-jmeter-3.0_src.zip >> 823b8257824644837ec451e025d293d4 *apache-jmeter-3.0_src.tgz >> >> Site Docs are here: >> http://home.apache.org/~milamber/jmeter-3.0RC2/docs/ >> >> Maven staging repository is accessible here: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejmeter-1007/org/apache/jmeter/ >> >> Tag: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jmeter/tags/v3_0_RC2/ >> >> Keys are here: >> https://www.apache.org/dist/jmeter/KEYS >> >> N.B. >> To download the dependencies: "ant download_jars" >> >> To create the jars and test JMeter: "ant package test". >> >> JMeter 3.0 requires Java 7 or later to run. >> >> Some known issues and incompatible changes are listed on changes page. >> http://home.apache.org/~milamber/jmeter-3.0RC2/docs/changes.html >> >> >> All feedback and vote are welcome. >> >> [ ] +1 I support this release >> [ ] +0 I am OK with this release >> [ ] -0 OK, but.... >> [X] -1 I do not support this release (please indicate why) >> > > (binding) > > Sorry but there are some files missing from the source archive: > > Only in v3_0_RC2: .gitignore > Only in v3_0_RC2: .svn > Only in v3_0_RC2: .travis.yml > Only in v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7: LICENSE > Only in > v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/bootstrap: > LICENSE > Only in > v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/bootstrap-social: > .gitignore > Only in > v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/datatables-responsive: > .gitignore > Only in v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/flot: > .gitignore > Only in v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/flot: > Makefile > Only in > v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/font-awesome: > .gitignore > Only in v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/holderjs: > .gitattributes > Only in v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/holderjs: > .gitignore > Only in > v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/holderjs/test: > .gitignore > Only in > v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/metisMenu: > LICENSE > Only in v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/mocha: > LICENSE > Only in v3_0_RC2/bin/report-template/sbadmin2-1.0.7/bower_components/morrisjs: > .gitignore > Only in v3_0_RC2: checkstyle-suppressions.xml > Only in v3_0_RC2: doap_JMeter.rdf > Only in v3_0_RC2/lib: api > Only in v3_0_RC2/lib: doc > Only in v3_0_RC2/lib: ext > Only in v3_0_RC2/lib: junit > Only in v3_0_RC2: rat-excludes.txt > Only in v3_0_RC2/test: resources > > The .* files are OK, as is the doap (we ought to move that) > Also the lib subdirectories. > > But the rest ought to be in the source archives, or some should > perhaps be dropped from SVN
The LICENSE files are misplaced. The software items need to be mentioned in the main LICENSE file, and stored under the licenses/ folder if necessary. It's important that the user does not have to go looking for LICENSE files; they need to be all included or referenced from the top level file. > Also the source archives don't agree: docs is missing from the zip file > > Maybe we don't actually need to store the docs tree in SVN but if we > do it should be in both the source archives. > >> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. >> >> The PMC members please indicate the mention "(binding)" with your vote. >> >> >> Note: If the vote passes, the intention is to release the archive files >> and rename the RC tag as the release tag. >> >> Thanks in advance! >> >> Milamber >> >> >> >>
