On 27 April 2016 at 20:26, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Vladimir, > My answers below. > > What do you think of point 1/ and 2/ ? > > Thanks > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Vladimir Sitnikov < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Philippe> Often only some test elements switch to the >> Philippe> new LAF which makes you think it works >> >> What makes you think of removing the feature? >> Is it hard to maintain? >> > It is broken and as it is possible to modify LAF through properties, I > prefer a working mechanism to a broken one. > Either we spend time on fixing it but IMO it is not worth the investment. > > I think having features that "partially work" in JMeter is not good for the > product reputation. > > > >> Do users complain about it? >> > > I as a user complain about it. No kidding I am a frequent user of JMeter > and I think people either don't know about it or don't use it, or live > with the bug. > > >> >> I do not switch LAF often, however I try it from time to time >> just to check if there is a better LAF. >> > > You will still be able to through properties.
Even easier to do it though the GUI. I find that when I switch LAF it is sticky, so next time it starts in the new LAF. So at worst the user has to switch LAF and restart - much easier than property editing. >> >> Vladimir >> > > > > -- > Cordialement. > Philippe Mouawad.
