Hi, About MQTT, have you check if the framework used in the PR is the best choice (performance)?
Another question, have you check if the framework used can do AMQP/STOMP? If we add a new framework (I don't have checked the PR yet), I think it will be greatto choose one which implement more protocol Antonio 2016-11-14 22:35 GMT+01:00 Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]>: > Hello, > Once 3.1 is released, should we merge this PR in JMeter ? > > I think we should provided all rights issues ( I think the PR is a fork of > another implementation) are ok. > > IOT is the future and I start to see commercial offers proposing MQTT from > Sas solutions > > > We should by the way really start working on: > - http2 > - websocket > > I raised in the past an idea about asking for help from Community as per > Apche policy, what do you think about it ? > > Another thing to look at would be to prticipate to google summer of code > and mentor somebody to work on this. > > What's your opinions ? > > Thanks > Regards > > FOr information a twitter > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 6:08 AM, Hemika Kodikara < > [email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > In my opinion having a MQTT sampler is very useful. I have seen several > > discussions(mails and PRs) on jmeter where an MQTT sampler is proposed. > > > > There are multiple message brokers out there which supports MQTT > protocol. > > Some are ActiveMQ, HiveMQ, IBM MessageSight, Mosquitto, RabbitMQ, WSO2 > > Message Broker. Performance testing and finding out numbers is the > > competing criteria among message brokers. Therefore having an MQTT > sampler > > through JMeter is advantageous in my point of view. > > > > It is not only that message brokers that use MQTT protocol. Several other > > IoT devices also use the MQTT protocol [1] for application purposes. > > > > [1] - > > https://dzone.com/articles/iot-software-platform- > > comparison?utm_medium=feed&utm_source=feedpress.me&utm_ > > campaign=Feed:%20dzone > > > > Regards, > > Hemika > > > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 4:28 AM, sebb <[email protected] > > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > > > > > Is there really a sufficient use case that we need to include it in > core? > > > > > > How many developers are familiar with the protocol and can maintain > > > the code and answer user queries? > > > > > > On 2 February 2016 at 22:49, Philippe Mouawad > > > <[email protected] > > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > > > > Hi , > > > > Any thoughts on this ? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > On Monday, January 25, 2016, Philippe Mouawad < > > > [email protected] > > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hello, > > > >> As you know we received a PR request for MQTT sampler. > > > >> Before we go further (contact the forked MQTT Sampler project to > know > > if > > > >> they agree to provide it to core, I think it is necessary no ?), > > > >> what's your opinion on it ? > > > >> > > > >> Should it be integrated in core ? > > > >> > > > >> My opinion is yes. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Regards > > > >> Philippe > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Cordialement. > > > > Philippe Mouawad. > > > > > > > > > -- > Cordialement. > Philippe Mouawad. > > > > > -- > Cordialement. > Philippe Mouawad. >
