On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Felix Schumacher < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all, > > I had a look at PR 235 and it addresses a valid bug. But I think the bug > goes a bit further than that. > > The patch addresses the case, where the processor first matches multiple > things with JSON Processor and after that gets an empty input for the > matching. In that case JMeter will leave the old values in refname_matchNr > and refname_<idx>. > > If on the other hand the first match is again a multi match and the second > gets processed with a matchnumber of "0". Then it gets a bit weird. > refname_matchNr will be set to the number of found elements, but no > elements will be stored in refname_<idx>. > > Thinking about this, I believe the correct result in both cases would be > to have no refname_matchNr and no refname_<idx> left in the vars. > > What do you think? > > I agree with your proposal > Regards, > > Felix > > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
