Great ! I think you can go ahead There was a discussion about a mocking framework to use. Graham started something around spock, Felix proposed jmockit, I don't know if he started something. And I mentioned mockito2 but without producing anything ;)
But maybe your work does not need a mocking framework. Regards On Thursday, February 16, 2017, Woonsan Ko <[email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > Hi folks, > > Is there anyone working in unit tests for JDBC protocol? > If not, I'd like to take a look into it next week. > > Cheers, > > Woonsan > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Philippe Mouawad > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > Thanks for your proposal. > > Yes it is still up to date. > > > > You can have a look at our Sonar report to know what needs testing: > > > > - https://builds.apache.org/analysis/ > > > > Our priorities regarding tests: > > > > - JDBC protocol (more the NON Gui classes) > > - HTTP (more non gui classes) > > - org.apache.jmeter.assertions: > > - .HTMLAssertion > > - JSR223Assertion > > - org.apache.jmeter.core.report > > - org.apache.jmeter.visualizers.backend.graphite > > - core/org/apache/jmeter/control > > > > Note coverage is not only related to JUnit tests but also to tests builds > > with JMX plans and ran with Jacoco agent. > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Sébastien Col <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> I would like to contribute to the project and I thought I could start > >> working on the task #41118bb8 related to test suite enhancement and > >> migration to JUnit 4. > >> I found it from the helpwanted.apache.org site. > >> Is it still up-to-date? > >> Regards, > >> Sebastien > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Cordialement. > > Philippe Mouawad. > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
