On 26 February 2017 at 21:47, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 10:43 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 26 February 2017 at 15:57, <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Author: pmouawad >> > Date: Sun Feb 26 15:57:25 2017 >> > New Revision: 1784457 >> > >> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1784457&view=rev >> > Log: >> > Add Non Regression tests on HTTP Request for: >> > Bug 60682 >> > Bug 60575 >> > >> > Added: >> > jmeter/trunk/bin/testfiles/TEST_HTTP.csv >> > jmeter/trunk/bin/testfiles/TEST_HTTP.jmx (with props) >> > jmeter/trunk/bin/testfiles/TEST_HTTP.xml (with props) >> >> The test name is far too generic. >> > If you have a better name go ahead > Maybe TestHttpRequest > >> >> It would be better to name it after the Bugs it tests. >> Even better would be one test script per bug. >> > I don't share this vision. > Using Bug ID is too restrictive and if we migrate one day to JIRA this will > be a problem.
No, it won't be a problem. JIRA has a field for the original Bugzilla id. In the meantime it's not at all obvious what TEST_HTTP is used for. > I just added bug id in test plan. That is not easy to read. > > > -- > Cordialement. > Philippe Mouawad.
