On Sun, 2017-09-03 at 17:47 +0200, Philippe Mouawad wrote: > Hi Oleg, > HC5 is still young (alpha) to migrate no ? > A first step for us would be to complete our migration from 4.2 to > 4.5. Do > you think it is useful or we should wait for HC5 to be GA and do the > migration at that time ? >
Not much younger than other implementations. > Regarding HTTP 2, HC5 without Java 9 has still the limitation with > ALPN > which means we need to move to Java 9 to have it. > *Sigh*. I already tried to explain the same thing more than once here on this list. HC does not have this limitation, JSSE does. All HTTP/2 running on pre Java9 JREs have _exactly_ the same problem. Some projects chose to employ various work-around for the issue involving various trade-offs and downsides. If you are comfortable using those work-arounds there is nothing stopping you from using them with HC. Oleg > Regarding work on HTTP2 and HC5, would you be able to help us on > moving > forward to HC5 + HTTP2 implementation or you already have a lot of > work on > it ? > Thanks > > > > > On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Wed, 2017-08-30 at 16:58 +0200, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Netty have release a new version with a new HTTP/2 API > > > > > > More information in > > > https://netty.io/news/2017/08/25/4-0-51-Final-4-1-15-Final.html > > > > > > I don't know if it's a good idea to wait for Hc5 and Java9. It > > > could > > > take > > > to much time before the 2 are released and more time will be > > > needed > > > to > > > implement it in JMeter > > > > > > Antonio > > > > > > > I am not quite sure what is stopping you from using HC5 already. I > > am > > not sure how exactly it is related to Java 9 at all. > > > > Oleg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2017-05-21 13:50 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gma > > > il.c > > > om>: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > Hc5 is making progress but will rely on java 9 for Alpl for > > > > example. > > > > > > > > Shouldn't we start some work in a new branch of JMeter (or > > > > create a > > > > branch > > > > for 3.x and work on 4.x in master) > > > > > > > > I see following pro/cons: > > > > + start some work asap > > > > + give feedback on hc5 and potentially orient some decisions on > > > > its > > > > design > > > > + oleg proposed his help > > > > + we need to rething recorder architecture as it's tightly > > > > linked > > > > to http1 > > > > > > > > - Hc5 is still alpha > > > > - I feel Oleg is a bit alone on this piece of work ( http/2) > > > > - It will only work with Java9 , when will java9 be released > > > > and > > > > what will > > > > be its adoption rate particularly with module feature which > > > > will > > > > also > > > > incurs work on our side > > > > > > > > And another thing, shouldn't we consider other libraries like > > > > netty > > > > for > > > > example ? > > > > > > > > Http/2 is coming at a high pace and I feel we should not wait > > > > anymore. > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, May 21, 2017, Felix Schumacher <felix.schumacher@ > > > > internetallee.de> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Am 18.05.2017 um 23:56 schrieb John Melom: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are there plans to support HTTP/2 in JMeter? I saw some > > > > > > discussion from > > > > > > a year ago, but haven’t seen anything about this since > > > > > > that. This will > > > > > > become increasingly important at my company and I would > > > > > > like to > > > > > > be in a > > > > > > position to provide some insight on the performance > > > > > > differences > > > > > > between > > > > > > HTTPS with HTTP 1.1 and HTTP/2. > > > > > > > > > > > > We are definitely interested in http/2 support for JMeter. > > > > > > But > > > > > > we are > > > > > > > > > > waiting for HTTPClient to support it, so that we can build > > > > > upon > > > > > that. > > > > > > > > > > Any help here is much appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > Felix > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > John Melom > > > > > > > > > > > > Performance Test Engineer > > > > > > > > > > > > Spōk, Inc. > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (952) 230 5311 <(952)%20230-5311> /Office/ > > > > > > > > > > > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > cid:[email protected] <http://info.spok.com/sp > > > > > > okmo > > > > > > bilevid> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > ------------ > > > > > > /*NOTE: This email message and any attachments are for the > > > > > > sole > > > > > > use of > > > > > > the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential > > > > > > and/or > > > > > > privileged > > > > > > information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or > > > > > > distribution is > > > > > > prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, > > > > > > please > > > > > > contact > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > sender by replying to this email, and destroy all copies of > > > > > > the > > > > > > original > > > > > > message and any material included with this email.*/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Cordialement. > > > > Philippe Mouawad. > > > > > > >
