On Monday, July 16, 2018, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Philippe, > > It's a good idea but I think we need to: > > Optimize the performance Felix has been improving this > > Improve the output during the generation to display something to the user a kind of windows progress bar :) as accurate ? :) > > Because when I made a big load test (many days with a high traffic), the > generation of dashboard take a lot of time You would force a non generation in this case no? > > Antonio > > Le dim. 15 juil. 2018 à 14:55, Philippe Mouawad < > p.moua...@ubik-ingenierie.com> a écrit : > > > Hello, > > Don't you think we should generate HTML report by default when running in > > NON Gui mode ? > > > > I see 3 reasons for that: > > > > - Why would somebody in 80% of cases do a load test without this > report > > output ? > > - Still now, I continue to read "dishonnest" comparisons of JMeter > with > > other tools (commercial or not) that say "JMeter has no reporting > > feature": > > - > > https://www.neotys.com/insights/how-neoload-is-different-from-jmeter > > - http://blog.loadimpact.com/how-to-do-10-things-in-jmeter-vs-k6 > > - https://www.guru99.com/performance-testing-tools.html > > - https://www.loadtestingtool.com/wapt-vs-jmeter.shtml > > - When doing trainings introducing JMeter, attendees are always > > surprised this report is not generated by default > > > > > > Globally, JMeter offers a lot of features but many must be activated > which > > is a bit sad, activating some would reduce learning curve and make it > more > > user friendly > > > > -- > > Regards. > > Philippe > > > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
