HTML Extractor is also very generic name. Let's understand which naming tradition do we use consistently for extractors - is it "by syntax used" or "by what it extracts"? Otherwise users will be confused when use HTML Extractor and when Boundary Extractor...
I am for "by syntax used" since this is a tradition we have up to now and it is less ambiguous. -- Andrey Pokhilko 02.08.2018 11:01, Jmeter Tea пишет: > Regex Extractor is more generic, it can extract from any text (JSON, plain, > XML, ....) > > On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Andrey Pokhilko <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> IMO name is fine, since it reflects the syntax. Regex Extractor also >> extracts from HTML, XPath Extractor also extracts from HTML. >> >> -- >> >> Andrey Pokhilko >> >> 02.08.2018 08:51, Jmeter Tea пишет: >>> It seems that CSS/JQuery Extractor name is a bit confusing, >>> Because it actually used to extract *HTML *using CSS/JQuery syntax >>> Isn't it better to rename it to HTML Extractor or HTML DOM Extractor ? >>> >>> Relevant question: >>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51644320/jmeter-how- >> to-use-the-jquery-not-css-extractor/51646040#51646040 >>
