I intended to add a new Panel (Evaluate Variables) with:

   - A radio box : Evaluate Variables
   - And a  User Defined Variables Table



On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 12:56 PM Andrey Pokhilko <[email protected]> wrote:

> Can you give a mock of how you envision it implemented in Flow Control
> Action?
>
> --
>
> Andrey Pokhilko
>
> 12.11.2018 14:50, Philippe Mouawad пишет:
> > Thanks for information.
> > I feel this behavior should be in core.
> >
> > To avoid another element, I think updating Flow Control Action is a good
> > candidate as it’s a sample about jmeter internals.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > On Monday, November 12, 2018, Andrey Pokhilko <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> There's already a plugin for that:
> >> https://jmeter-plugins.org/wiki/SetVariablesAction/
> >>
> >> It is exactly a sampler that is used to evaluate functions/variables.
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Andrey Pokhilko
> >>
> >> 11.11.2018 20:53, Philippe Mouawad пишет:
> >>> Hello,
> >>> Frequently when using JMeter functions, users don't really know for
> >> certain
> >>> use cases where to put the function, here are few examples:
> >>>
> >>>    - Any function which output will not be used directly by sample
> >>>    parameters
> >>>    - Such type of functions:
> >>>       - https://jmeter-plugins.org/wiki/InterThreadCommunication/
> >>>    - you want to create a variable from the output of a function and
> >> update
> >>>    it on each iteration:
> >>>       - User Defined Variable is not an option as evaluation occurs on
> >>>       start of test
> >>>       - User Parameters being a preprocessor, it would be evaluated on
> >> each
> >>>       call, so you need to nest it inside a Flow Control Action, not
> very
> >>>       intuitive right ?
> >>>
> >>> I also remember when I started using JMeter that I found this part
> >>> counter-intuitive.
> >>>
> >>> I think it would be nice to have a solution for this, that would
> evaluate
> >>> the variables/functions exactly at the place where the call is present
> >> and
> >>> without generating any SampleResult.
> >>>
> >>> We could implement this:
> >>>
> >>>    - as an enhancement to Flow Control Action
> >>>    - as a new Sampler
> >>>
> >>> What's your thoughts on this ?
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>>
> >
>


-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.

Reply via email to