On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 10:20 PM Vladimir Sitnikov <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Philippe> The only concern for me is not complexifying versions comparisons
>
> What do you mean by that?
>

I mean comparing sources between revisions. If structure changes that can
be harder

>
> By the way: what is with Git vs SVN?
> Git handles file renames just fine, so regular git blame (e.g. the one
> integrated into IDE) works just fine across file moves.
>
We are on svn for now right ?


> > Maven is fast enough I think since parallelism was introduced.
>
> Just a datapoint: https://github.com/apache/calcite
> repeated call to `mvn validate -Dcheckstyle.skip=true` takes 3.6 sec for
> me. What this command does it just validates project configuration.
> I would not call that awful, but it is kind of painful. Maven's parallelism
> almost never happens in practice.
>
> JMeter's `ant` takes 3 seconds for me and it builds the jars
>
ok

>
> [INFO] Reactor Summary:
> [INFO]
> [INFO] Calcite 1.19.0-SNAPSHOT ............................ SUCCESS [
> 0.710 s]
> [INFO] Calcite Linq4j ..................................... SUCCESS [
> 0.017 s]
> [INFO] Calcite Core ....................................... SUCCESS [
> 1.045 s]
> [INFO] Calcite Babel ...................................... SUCCESS [
> 0.131 s]
> [INFO] Calcite Cassandra .................................. SUCCESS [
> 0.167 s]
> [INFO] Calcite Druid ...................................... SUCCESS [
> 0.036 s]
> [INFO] Calcite Elasticsearch .............................. SUCCESS [
> 0.174 s]
> [INFO] Calcite Examples ................................... SUCCESS [
> 0.011 s]
> [INFO] Calcite Example CSV ................................ SUCCESS [
> 0.023 s]
> [INFO] Calcite Example Function ........................... SUCCESS [
> 0.017 s]
> [INFO] Calcite File ....................................... SUCCESS [
> 0.056 s]
> [INFO] Calcite Geode ...................................... SUCCESS [
> 0.069 s]
> [INFO] Calcite MongoDB .................................... SUCCESS [
> 0.020 s]
> [INFO] Calcite Pig ........................................ SUCCESS [
> 0.199 s]
> [INFO] Calcite Piglet ..................................... SUCCESS [
> 0.014 s]
> [INFO] Calcite Plus ....................................... SUCCESS [
> 0.029 s]
> [INFO] Calcite Server ..................................... SUCCESS [
> 0.107 s]
> [INFO] Calcite Spark ...................................... SUCCESS [
> 0.209 s]
> [INFO] Calcite Splunk ..................................... SUCCESS [
> 0.016 s]
> [INFO] Calcite Ubenchmark 1.19.0-SNAPSHOT ................. SUCCESS [
> 0.057 s]
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Total time: 3.406 s
>
> Vladimir
>


-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.

Reply via email to