On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 at 10:57, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > sebb> Yes, but AFAICT he implied that he was doing additional tests. > > Of course I run tons of Gradle commands while developing the build scripts. > I adjust scripts and rebuild/clean/build/launch tests. > > However, it just works, so I don't really a reason to write a > sophisticated (or any other kind) documentation on that.
We have no idea what you have tested. We don't know if you have covered all the requirements. All we know is that you assert that your tests have not shown any problems. Just as we expect a patch author to provide unit tests, you need to show that the Gradle build does what we need it to do. > sebb>I was suggesting that the layout can be changed later. > > I see your suggestion, however It would make my life harder, so I just > decline that offer. > > Note: you need to have a technical justification if you want to veto > the change. I see file movement might hurt your (or someone else's) > feelings, however I don't aim to hurt feelings. I'm sure I move files > for a good reason. I don't disagree that it may be advantageous to move the files at some point. I do disagree with bundling it together with the development of the Gradle scripts. > sebb> One could then compare Ant with Maven to validate the outputs > > Maven is a strong -1. Please don't take quotes out of context. I never said otherwise; it was just part of an example of how we could have approached a switch to Maven. > sebb> Yes please! > > I see your suggestion, but I tentatively decline that. Thanks. > > Vladimir
