Hello, Suggestion about number implemented in : https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63450
Feel free to test it and give feedback using next nightly build. Thanks Regards On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 7:46 PM Alexander Podelko <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > Thanks for the great feature - 'Recorder: Transaction Control' ! > We have two options there - 'Transaction name' and 'Perfix'. A couple of > thoughts here. > > When we select 'Transaction name', it uses that name for both Transaction > Controller and ALL sample names underneath. Not optimal approach in my case > - I'd rather keep urls as sample names (to be able separate them) and use > the transaction name for Transaction Controller only. > When we select 'Prefix', it puts it before the number - which, as far as I > understand here, may mess up sorting in reports etc. So I wonder if putting > prefix behind the number may be a better option at least in some cases. > Not saying that these suggestion are better - I guess it shouldn't be a > big problem to have all 4 options. Or, maybe, some kind of format options - > where you specify exactly what transaction and sample names would be - > would be a more generic and elegant solution. > Just thoughts.... > > Thanks,Alex > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
