Am 28.05.19 um 21:44 schrieb Vladimir Sitnikov: > Felix> I find those historic documents valuable > > What's the use case? > It is sufficient that the files are present in SVN, isn'it? I like to find them in the current repo I am working on and think that searching historic versions is so much easier in git than in svn, but you are of course right, that I could find them in the svn repo (given that we both think it will stay available as read only). > > Felix> so if it is not too much trouble, I would keep them. > > It is not a trouble to keep them in SVN. > > However we don't want to clutter UI (e.g. GitHub branch selector) with > tons of outdated branches when there's just one or two live ones. It > is sad that Git has no notion of 'hidden' branches/tags.
I will not fight over this. I can work around such clutter, but it seems you are more eager to remove them, then I am keen on keeping them. And you are doing all the work and I am just a bystander. Felix P.S.: my reply was meant to be sent to the dev list and your responses seem valuable, so I will steer this back to the original discussion > > Vladimir
