On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 07:42, Felix Schumacher <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Am 17.06.19 um 21:57 schrieb sebb: > > On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 17:44, Felix Schumacher > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Am 16.06.19 um 21:02 schrieb Felix Schumacher: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I tried to adapt the buildbot config for JMeter to reflect the git > >>> migration. > >>> > >>> The init-svnVersion step has been removed and most of the "got_revision" > >>> properties are replaced by the buildnumber to keep a linear numbering > >>> for the nightlies. The only place were I kept the got_revision property > >>> is the java property for the "svn" version. > >>> > >>> So maybe we have nightlies again tomorrow > >> Nightlies are building again (after I removed some svn specific stuff in > >> the build.xml files and used the correct branch everywhere). > >> > >> But the nightlies are not getting indexed. There seems to be shell > >> script involved named create-jmeter-nightlies-index.sh which might have > >> to be updated. I don't know, since I don't even know where the sources > >> for that script are. > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/public_html/projects/jmeter/nightlies > > Thanks. > > At the moment the script looks for directories named r{number} where > number was the revision of the subversion repo. I changed the number to > buildnumber (which is way smaller than the revision number). The > directories are sorted by that number. That will cause the new builds to > be at the end of the list. The list gets capped and the entries not > shown -- at least not for the next 30 days or so. > > I wonder if it would be nicer to change the naming scheme from r{number} > to b{number} to indicate that we now use buildnumbers instead of > revisions.
That would be simplest. > Or go wild and use git revisions and sort by file creation > date instead of file name. > > What do you think? But whatever works best; it's not critical to have these. > Felix > > > > >> Felix > >> > >>> Felix > >>>
