Go ahead Graham :) On Wednesday, October 2, 2019, Graham Russell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sounds good to me too, and if any are stubborn, or would look better > as Spock tests, perhaps we can re-write them? > > I can attempt this tonight if no-one else has currently started it? > > Graham > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 17:24, Philippe Mouawad > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Ok by me > > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 4:12 PM Vladimir Sitnikov < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > What do you think if we migrate existing JUnit4 tests to JUnit5, and > > > somehow forbid adding new JUnit4 tests? > > > For instance, we can add Spotless formatting step that automatically > > > replaces "import org.junit.Test" with "org.junit.jupiter.api.Test" > within > > > java files :) > > > > > > In most of the cases, the migration is as simple as replacing > > > org.junit.Test with org.junit.jupiter.api.Test. > > > > > > In my point of view, the removal of JUnit4-based tests would simplify > > > maintenance as it would reduce (at least temporary) the number of > different > > > test styles. > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > Vladimir > > > > > > > > > -- > > Cordialement. > > Philippe Mouawad. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Cordialement. > > Philippe Mouawad. > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
