Hello, For information: - https://blogs.apache.org/security/entry/cve-2021-44228
Regards On Tuesday, December 14, 2021, Philippe Mouawad < [email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > For me both 6.0 and 5.5 are ok. > Regards > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 9:02 PM Milamber <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Currently, I prefer release 5.5 as version, add deprecated elements if >> needed. >> >> for 6.0 version, probably we can migrate JMeter on next openjdk LTS 11 >> (or why not 17) (so with OpenJDK official support instead Oracle Java). >> Using recent openjdk allow improvements from java release. >> >> and for 6.0, add support for HTTP/2.0 request seems be a requirement. >> >> Milamber >> >> On 07/12/2021 19:07, Felix Schumacher wrote: >> > Am 07.12.21 um 18:48 schrieb Vladimir Sitnikov: >> >>> I would be fine with both versions 5.5 and 6.0. >> >> Same for me. >> >> I am limited in time :-/, so I would not be able to rename 5.5 -> 6.0, >> >> so I would suggest releasing as 5.5, and going for 6.0 a bit later. >> >> >> >> I thought I could work on DSL this December, however, it turns out not >> to >> >> be the case. >> >> >> >>> and more important a major version could be a good point to drop old >> >>> stuff >> >> I am afraid it does not work that way. >> >> If we want to drop something, we need to announce the deprecation plan >> in >> >> advance. >> >> AFAIK MongoDB is not deprecated (at least, MongoScriptSampler is not >> >> deprecated), so there's no option to drop it yet. >> > That is what I meant. If we want to use the next major version to drop >> > things. 5.5 would be a good opportunity to mark those features as >> > deprecated. >> > >> > >> >>> so a 6.0 is not necessarily needed >> >> In 99% of the cases, the versions are there to convey the changes to >> the >> >> end-users. >> >> I really like realver: >> >> https://twitter.com/lorenc_dan/status/1209289792569131008 >> >> >> >> 6.0 would mean "hey, there's something big, go and try it" :) >> > That is true, too :) >> > >> > Felix >> > >> >> Vladimir >> >> >> >> > > -- > Cordialement > Philippe M. > Ubik-Ingenierie > -- Cordialement Philippe M. Ubik-Ingenierie
