I now also checked the jsonb api. We are now 1:1 with the spec. Would go on and move it over to geronimo for a proper handling and then release both the JSONP and JSONB API jars.
LieGrue, strub > Am 30.03.2017 um 10:54 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <[email protected]>: > > I did not indeed > can give it a try tonight maybe? > > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Did anyone had a chance to check the signatures for the jsonb API part? >> >> If not I try to do it today. >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >>> Am 29.03.2017 um 09:12 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] >>> : >>> >>> if both spec are aligned with "current" versions +1 >>> >>> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ >> rmannibucau> | >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory >>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> >>> >>> 2017-03-29 7:13 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> Thanks Mark. >>>> I'll give it a look but nothing from me so far >>>> >>>> Le mar. 28 mars 2017 23:28, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> a >>>> écrit : >>>> >>>>> Hi folks! >>>>> >>>>> We just finished implementing JSONP-1.1. >>>>> >>>>> The sig of geronimo-json-1.1 is now 1:1 with the RI. So we could >> release >>>>> this and ship a johnzon-1.1.0. >>>>> Will also check the sig of the jsonb and move it over to geronimo in >> the >>>>> same go. >>>>> >>>>> Anything I missed? >>>>> >>>>> That means please test it if you find some early showstopper. We will >>>>> later ship further versions, so no worry if not all is perfect right >> now. >>>>> >>>>> txs and LieGrue, >>>>> strub >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >>
