I've now created a github issue. https://github.com/jakartaee/jsonb-api/issues/344
Jean-Louis, you are more experienced in this area: is this the correct way to file a TCK challenge for JSON-B? txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 19.09.2023 um 13:56 schrieb Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>: > > This gets even wilder as the non-CDI TCK test has the correct behaviour: > > > https://github.com/jakartaee/jsonb-api/blob/master/tck/src/main/java/ee/jakarta/tck/json/bind/customizedmapping/serializers/model/serializer/AnimalListDeserializer.java#L40 > > > So the JSON-B TCK test for native deserialisers assumes different behaviour > than the TCK test for deserialisers which use CDI? Should not be imo! > > LieGrue, > strub > >> Am 19.09.2023 um 13:42 schrieb Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.INVALID>: >> >> hi! >> >> Trying to work on the few TCK tests which still fail in Johnzon. >> >> Does anyone understand why the following deserializer is expecting to see a >> START_OBJECT of the actual items instead of the actual current JsonValue >> event which is a START_ARRAY? >> >> https://github.com/jakartaee/jsonb-api/blob/master/tck/src/main/java/ee/jakarta/tck/json/bind/cdi/customizedmapping/serializers/model/serializer/AnimalListDeserializerInjected.java#L44 >> >> >> The value to parse is >> { "animals" : [ { "type" : "cat", "cuddly" : true, "age" : 5, "furry" : >> true, "name" : "Garfield" , "weight" : 10.5}, { "type" : "dog", "barking" : >> true, "age" : 3, "furry" : false, "name" : "Milo", "weight" : 5.5}, { "type" >> : "animal", "age" : 6, "furry" : false, "name" : "Tweety", "weight" : 0.5} ] >> } >> >> This is from the TCK test >> ee.jakarta.tck.json.bind.cdi.customizedmapping.serializers.SerializersCustomizationCDITest >> >> My problem is that a List<X> or X[] in Java can be represented as json >> object which is more complicated, e.g. >> >> { >> "animals": >> { >> "size":3, >> "values": [ { "type" : "cat", "cuddly" : true, "age" : 5, "furry" : >> true, "name" : "Garfield" , "weight" : 10.5}, { "type" : "dog", "barking" : >> true, "age" : 3, "furry" : false, "name" : "Milo", "weight" : 5.5}, { "type" >> : "animal", "age" : 6, "furry" : false, "name" : "Tweety", "weight" : 0.5} ] >> } >> } >> >> I don't see how the approach implemented by Yasson will allow to deserialise >> such a JSON string. >> >> Or do I miss something? >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >
