I'll do that very quick during my noon time today.
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com


On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 10:55 AM Richard Zowalla <r...@apache.org> wrote:

> Any news here? I'll wait for the 2.0.0 release before merging the owb4
> changes to TomEE main :-)
>
> On 2023/10/18 18:52:42 Jean-Louis Monteiro wrote:
> > Yes this is on my plan as discussed on slack. I'll try to do it before
> the
> > weekend
> >
> > Le mer. 18 oct. 2023, 17:06, Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>
> > a écrit :
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Am Mi., 18. Okt. 2023 um 17:02 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > Hi Markus,
> > > >
> > > > Sound good.
> > > >
> > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > > > <
> > > >
> > >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Le mer. 18 oct. 2023 à 16:37, Markus Jung <m...@markus-jung.dev> a
> > > écrit :
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > wdyt on releasing johnzon 2.0.0 (or at least a RC/milestone) as
> we're
> > > > > now EE 10 compatible? Is there anything I can pick up that still
> needs
> > > > > to be done beforehand to speed up that process?
> > > > >
> > > > > I've already taken a look at the site last week and updated it
> > > > > accordingly for 2.0.0: https://github.com/apache/johnzon/pull/113
> > > > >
> > > > > At least in jira there's no open tickets for 2.0.0
> > > > > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/JOHNZON/versions/12352737
> )
> > > > > except for JOHNZON-399 which to me seems more like a discussion
> right
> > > now
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Markus
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to