Just to be sure: so we exclude JOHNZON-414
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JOHNZON-414> -> JOHNZON-416
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JOHNZON-416> from the release?
Anyway no issue, was just a heads up if the fix was coming within the week.

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://x.com/rmannibucau> | .NET Blog
<https://dotnetbirdie.github.io/> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.github.io/> | Old
Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
<https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/en-us/product/java-ee-8-high-performance-9781788473064>


Le mer. 14 mai 2025 à 15:47, Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> It would be good to get something out with this fix:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JOHNZON-413. I'm happy to volunteer
> to cut a 2.0.3 with fixes as as result of David's additional tests as well
> (and I'm happy to get involved with fixing them too).
>
> I'll run through the release process and create a vote this afternoon.
>
> Jon
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 2:07 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jon,
> >
> > no objection, just wonder if we want to include the issues David just
> > opened about adapters - being said a few will fall in spec area but
> several
> > are easy to grasp and would be positive overall.
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://x.com/rmannibucau> | .NET Blog
> > <https://dotnetbirdie.github.io/> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.github.io/
> >
> > | Old
> > Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > <
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/en-us/product/java-ee-8-high-performance-9781788473064
> > >
> >
> >
> > Le mer. 14 mai 2025 à 13:22, Jonathan Gallimore <
> > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >
> > > Any objections if I cut a 2.0.2 release? It looks like its been a year
> > > since 2.0.1 and there's been a few fixes in that time.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Jon
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to