Thanks Markus for pointing this out. I'll add Jon's key to KEYS. Here is my +1 (binding) The rest looks good to me.
Le dim. 18 mai 2025 à 20:19, Markus Jung <ju...@apache.org> a écrit : > formally I have to vote -1 (non binding) for now, your code signing key is > not in https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/johnzon/KEYS, maybe > someone from PMC can help out? It appears to already be in > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS so really is just a > matter of copying and committing > > > Everything else I checked looks good however: > - signature itself is good on binaries/source bundles > - tests are okay > - full tomee build with this RC looks good (failing tests are johnzon > unrelated IMO) > > > Thanks for taking the time to create this RC! > > Markus > > > > On 14. May 2025, at 18:43, Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > HI All, > > > > I'm starting a vote for Apache Johnzon 2.0.2. Please note that I am NOT a > > PMC member. I have done the manual work of creating this release > candidate, > > but the final steps will be carried out by a PMC member. > > > > Git tag: https://github.com/apache/johnzon/tree/v2.0.2 > > Staging Repository: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1064/ > > Sources and binaries: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/johnzon/johnzon-2.0.2/ > > > > Release Notes: > > > > Bug > > - [JOHNZON-405] - johnzon-jsonb has compile dependency on openwebbeans > > - [JOHNZON-407] - NullPointerException in > > JsonArrayBuilderImpl(Collection<?>) constructor when collection contains > > data type that calls add method that refers to unset jsonProvider member > > - [JOHNZON-413] - Missing json values fail when using @JsonbCreator and > > @JsonbTypeAdapter > > New Feature > > - [JOHNZON-412] - Add default mapping for java.util.UUID > > Improvement > > - [JOHNZON-404] - fix BoundedOutputStreamWriter for jdk 22 > > - [JOHNZON-406] - Add API jars to bin distribution > > Task > > - [JOHNZON-409] - Replace ThreadLocal DateFormat with DateTimeFormatter > > > > Please VOTE > > [+1] go for it > > [+0] meh, don't care > > [-1] stop, with why > > > > The VOTE is open for 72h (or as needed) > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Jon > > -- Jean-Louis
