+1 Am Di., 11. Aug. 2026 um 16:32 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg via dev < [email protected]>:
> looks really great. Go for it! > > I think we should create a ticket for setting up the git repo for site and > then just do it. > > +1 from me for it. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 11.08.2026 um 16:22 schrieb Markus Jung <[email protected]>: > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > I'd like to propose rewriting the site. The current one pretty old, IMO > does not look good and is generated through maven which more often than not > causes problems regenerating and publishing it since we don't do it very > often. > > > > > > As an experiment I've rebuilt the site independent of maven on top of a > static html generator and gave it a more modern look, you can find a > deployed version here https://jungm.github.io/johnzon-site-proposal/, > source code would be on https://github.com/jungm/johnzon-site-proposal. > This also intentionally drops all reports maven injected into the site, the > only thing remaining right now would be javadocs. > > > > WDYT of this? Should we be redoing the site in general? Do you like the > proposal, would you change something or do it completely different? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Markus > > > >
