already not sure but we should for sure
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-01-23 11:19 GMT+01:00 Hendrik Dev <[email protected]>: > +0, IMHO very special but why not > > BTW: What about multidimensional arrays/array of arrays? Do we already > support this/do we need this? > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> Do we want to support Class<?> getX()? >> >> Personally I'm +-0. It mainly means enhancing our Mapper to handle it >> to do a getName() and a loadClass depending if we write/read. >> >> It can already be solved with a custom Converter but wonder if we >> should go further. personally I never needed it but just realized we >> fail in such a case. >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >> https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > -- > Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) > @hendrikdev22 > PGP: 0x22D7F6EC
