Hi!

based on the lazy consensus here (nobody objected and Tommaso
was +1) I drafted the following resolution for this month:

WHEREAS, the Project Management Committee of the Apache Joshua project
has arrived at a consensus to recommend moving the project to the
Attic; and

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it no longer in the best interest
of the Foundation to continue the Apache Joshua project due to
inactivity;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Apache Joshua project is
hereby terminated; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Attic PMC be and hereby is tasked with oversight
over the software developed by the Apache Joshua Project; and be it
further

RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Joshua" is hereby
terminated; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache Joshua PMC is hereby terminated.


Thanks,
Roman.

On 2021/10/19 14:16:49 Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> It seems to me that we (PMC and the whole Joshua community) currently don't
> have neither resources nor time to keep developing Joshua as a proper
> Apache TLP, unfortunately.
> I think it's time for Joshua to pursue the Attic way.
> If no one objects I'll prepare the resolution for the next board meeting.
>
> Regards,
> Tommaso
>
>
>
> On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 02:25, Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi there again!
> >
> > I can't help bu try to resurrect this old thread -- still wondering
> > if the project is dormant to a point where Attic maybe considered
> > a good option or whether PMC still wants to carry on.
> >
> > Can someone please clarify?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Roman.
> >
> > On 2021/04/19 02:28:49, Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I've noticed that Joshua's level of activity in 2021
> > > is virtually 0 and it also seems that the board report
> > > has been chronically missing. I totally understand that
> > > project activity ebbs and flows, but at the same time
> > > it is important to have at least 3 PMC members who
> > > are active enough for a project to be considered
> > > still alive.
> > >
> > > Do y'all think you still have 3 of you who may qualify? ;-)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Roman.
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to