I don't see why not?

> On Oct 14, 2016, at 3:36 AM, Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Matt,
> 
> thanks for pushing this forward, +1 from me.
> One concern I have is related to the language packs licensing, can we
> distribute them under AL2 license ? (as "convenience" binaries as the
> official release consists of the Joshua source code).
> I'm asking this because in OpenNLP we have had this long time issue of the
> models licensing.
> 
> Regards,
> Tommaso
> 
> 
> 
> Il giorno gio 13 ott 2016 alle ore 18:58 Matt Post <p...@cs.jhu.edu> ha
> scritto:
> 
>> Hi folks,
>> 
>> I think I'm going to do the 6.1 release tomorrow. Any objections?
>> 
>> Along with the release will be about 60 language packs for a large range
>> of languages. These will be released early next week and will be built on
>> BerkeleyLM, so that there are no external dependencies.
>> 
>> I'd like to push out the release quietly until the language packs are
>> ready, uploaded, and linked.
>> 
>> Is there anything I need to know to do an Apache release?
>> 
>> matt
>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to