I really have no idea, I just executed the Maven commands as per wiki [1], then I found out that in my /target directory I had all the expected artifacts but no md5 / sha1 signatures for them, on the other hand it seems they got generated at some point and existed in the staging repo on Nexus. Having realized that I manually created the md5 counterparts for source distribution packages and uploaded both artifacts and md5 signatures to /dist.
I am not sure myself if this is a somewhat ok or expected behaviour (it's one of my first times as a release manager). I guess we could simply put the stuff from Nexus on /dist/dev instead, as that will anyway be the one that goes in /dist/release once we release the staging repo, WDYT? Regards, Tommaso [1] : https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/JOSHUA/Joshua+Release+Management+Procedure#JoshuaReleaseManagementProcedure-Preparingareleasecandidate%28RC%29forcommunityVOTE%27ing Il giorno ven 31 mar 2017 alle ore 21:24 Matt Post <p...@cs.jhu.edu> ha scritto: Yes, I've verified that those don't match, either. I can't think of a reason that they *shouldn't* match. Tommaso, do you have any idea why they're different? Are these two locations out of sync? > On Mar 29, 2017, at 12:58 PM, Michael A. Hedderich < m...@michael-hedderich.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > from my last mail: > > "What does not match for me are the md5 or sha1 of the stagging repo with > those of the source release artifacts. E.g. https://repository.apache.org/ > content/repositories/orgapachejoshua-1005/org/apache/joshua/joshua > -incubating/6.1/joshua-incubating-6.1-src.tar.gz.md5 vs > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/joshua/6.1/joshua > -incubating-6.1-src.tar.gz.md5 " > > If this is the expected behavior, then its a +1 from me, too. > > Cheers, > Michael > > 2017-03-29 12:07 GMT-04:00 lewis john mcgibbney <lewi...@apache.org>: > >> Hi Folks, >> I would also like to encourage people to take a look and VOTE as soon as >> possible. >> I'm in regular contact with some folks over at the Linguistic Data >> Consortium [0] (as are several of us I'm sure) and they have tentatively >> agreed to announce our release (should it be done by then) in their next >> newsletter... which has a wide reader base. >> >> Thank you Tommaso for hanging on here. >> >> To clarify, I'm a +1 >> >> [0] https://www.ldc.upenn.edu/ >> >> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 8:39 AM, < >> dev-digest-h...@joshua.incubator.apache.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> From: Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> >>> To: "dev@joshua.incubator.apache.org" <dev@joshua.incubator.apache.org> >>> Cc: >>> Bcc: >>> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 15:39:18 +0000 >>> Subject: Re: ping on RC4 vote >>> ping >>> >>> >> > > > 2017-03-29 12:07 GMT-04:00 lewis john mcgibbney <lewi...@apache.org>: > >> Hi Folks, >> I would also like to encourage people to take a look and VOTE as soon as >> possible. >> I'm in regular contact with some folks over at the Linguistic Data >> Consortium [0] (as are several of us I'm sure) and they have tentatively >> agreed to announce our release (should it be done by then) in their next >> newsletter... which has a wide reader base. >> >> Thank you Tommaso for hanging on here. >> >> To clarify, I'm a +1 >> >> [0] https://www.ldc.upenn.edu/ >> >> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 8:39 AM, < >> dev-digest-h...@joshua.incubator.apache.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> From: Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> >>> To: "dev@joshua.incubator.apache.org" <dev@joshua.incubator.apache.org> >>> Cc: >>> Bcc: >>> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 15:39:18 +0000 >>> Subject: Re: ping on RC4 vote >>> ping >>> >>> >>
