Sounds like a good plan to me as well. +1
On Sep 20, 2017 8:05 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (3010)" < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > +1 from me! > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office (3010) > Manager, NSF & Open Source Projects Formulation and Development Offices > (8212) > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 180-503E, Mailstop: 180-503 > Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > On 9/20/17, 2:50 AM, "Tommaso Teofili" <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> wrote: > > hi all, > > how about : > - moving the master branch into a 6.x branch > - merging 7 branch into master > > This way we can support 6.1 with bugfixes and minor releases and go > ahead > with development on version 7. > > Regards, > Tommaso > > >
