dertown wrote:
I can understand the Idea and reasoning but i am wondering if you would implement something else to preform safty checks or leave that to indivdual users?
The idea is that Ruby's professed safety checks are so unlikely to actually be safe that they're not even worth implementing. But we'd like some safety mechanism, yes?
I would propose that Ruby's SAFE levels be redefined in JRuby to represent something equivalent in the JVM, using JVM security mechanisms. So they won't be identical, but they'll provide a similar mechanism under JRuby to prevent certain types of operations.
Thoughts? - Charlie --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
