Thomas E Enebo wrote:
Unless you want to acquire it by reflection and setAccessible it, then I would say that 0.5 requires 1.0.1? We could just test the waters and make this a requirement. If people don't like it we can spin another AR-JDBC release which does what I first suggest so that it continues to work with 1.0.
I don't think it's too much to ask that people upgrade to 1.0.1 to use AR-JDBC 0.5.
- Charlie --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
