>The recent hassle with Joni in externals has shown that svn:externals are just 
>not going to be usable for us. They break our ability to roll back to a 
>previous release, since externals do not by default lock to a specific 
>revision. They introduce fragility into the codebase since we can't depend on 
>an external resource to not change. And they don't work with a number of 
>tools, including some IDEs and CI servers.
>
>So for the future, the correct ways to include an external library are (in 
>order of preference):
>
>- as a released JAR file (released as in Maven builds can work too)
>- as an unreleased/snapshot JAR file (we need to lock external dependencies to 
>a specific built version of a library)
>- copy the library in wholesale (only a temporary solution until a binary can 
>replace it)

Did you consider using Piston for situations where you need the actual source 
code from an external dependency in your build environment?

  http://piston.rubyforge.org/

I normally use it instead of svn:externals -- the result is similar but using 
Piston I check-in to my repository the complete external code (reverts work) 
and I can also lock my copy of the external source code to a particular 
revision in the external repository.

The example on the first page of the rubyforge site shows use with rails but it 
can be used generally also.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

Reply via email to