yes! On 12/20/07, Charles Oliver Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I propose that from now until we get the next 1.1 prerelease out (post > beta 2), performance work should be a second priority. We're currently > at 45 open bugs on 1.0 branch, 103 on 1.1 branch (trunk...and 3 are high > priorities for 1.1b2), 8 scheduled for "1.x", and 143 unscheduled. > > I believe we need to work on reducing the number of bugs. Performance is > looking great by most accounts, and we still need to accept performance > bugs as they come in. But performance should be secondary for a while > behind getting functionality, stability, and uniformity (of API, etc) > fixes done. > > This would include performance of Joni itself, which we need to look at > getting a stable, official release of. > > Of course any really egregious performance problems can get a higher > priority, and any fixes related to memory leaks are top-priority above > general functionality bugs. > > Seem like a reasonable plan for now? > > - Charlie > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > >
-- Blog: http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ThomasEEnebo Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] , [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
