On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 15:58 +0200, Ola Bini wrote: > So, I'm thinking about the new change that makes Java Exceptions be > outside the regular hierarchy of exceptions. This is quite nice in many > circumstances, but it's also kinda bad for many of the circumstances > where you want to catch everything and handle it correctly. As a typical > example: when spec:ji fails on a Java exception, the whole test run > immediately dies, because there is no Java code that can actually catch > the exceptions from Java without extra code. > > Is this really what we want?
I don't think it is. This kind of thing is going to create bad problems for parts of Omnibus as well. -mental
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
