Brian Takita wrote:
Hello, I was wondering what people's thoughts about having JRuby have
better integration with TerraCotta.
What sort of things would that involve?
I worked on a team where a couple of developers spiked on JRuby +
TerraCotta and they reported that a Java proxy object needed to be
created and there were issues with distributing Procs.
Does this mean that if (or since if thats how JRuby is currently
implemented) every Ruby object has a corresponding JVM object, then
you can transparently share any Ruby object across the cluster?
There's definitely some opportunity here, but nobody actively looking
into it. We'd love to help improve/modify JRuby to better support
Terracotta and similar setups. So if you wanted to start exploring it in
more depth, we'd be right here to support ya :)
- Charlie
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
