On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Charles Oliver
Nutter<[email protected]> wrote:
> It does! It looks like pop is not being bound right. Michael reported this
> bug:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-3845
>
> Which fixes it temporarily by restoring the 1_8/1_9 version split. I'm
> going to look at doing it right, which may simply mean removing the
> annotation on the old 1_8 version of pop...
Ok, I fixed this in 9560b3a and will update the bug to refer to the
actual problem.
The actual problem is that you can't have multiple Java method names
bound to the same Ruby name. It's just a limitation of the current
annotation-based binding logic. But it fails in an ugly way, so we
should fix it or have a nice error/warning.
187 branch should build now.
- Charlie
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
