Ok, I see that there is rudimentary package support based on the relative dir in which the file lives. Is that what "we" want? One thing that's always bugged me about Java files is that they have to be in the dir structure; but on the other hand, we can't make it *not* require .class files be in that structure.
Perhaps what actually annoyed me was that you had to put it in the appropriate path *and* have a "package" declaration in the file? On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm adding package support now, but if you (Ryan) already added it, > let me know. It should be pretty basic, at any rate; an attr_accessor > :package on Script and a PackageNode + macro to create it. > > Exciting example: > > package org.jruby > > - Charlie > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
