juan, Txs.
W.r.t. mobile "readiness", this is still on the to-do list. Adapting Haddock for mobile should now be more easy (primarily impacting the css), as the stylesheet is fully based on bootstrap, with mobility support build in from the start. I did some first basic testing, which looked ok for readability. But more flows need to be tested. dirk On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Juan Pablo Santos RodrÃguez < juanpablo.san...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > just in case, I've been uploading snapshots with all recent commits, so > it's possible to download the war, or a portable build, from > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/jspwiki > and also test the latest trunk. > > wrt to haddock template, it looks really well!! I specially like the reader > view feature, it's extremely handy on mobile > > > br, > juan pablo > > On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Harry Metske <harry.met...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I did some testing too, works very well, could not find any real bugs, > and > > it looks good. > > I noticed 2 things (not sure if related to the template though) : > > > > 1) the page author ( in many cases) consists of 2 IP addresses , see for > > example http://digitalspider.com.au/testwiki/Wiki.jsp?page=Authortest > > (created with an empty profile). > > > > 2) Is it possible to reduce the second blue area at the top (containing > > pagetitle and breadcrumbtrail), can you sort of combine it into the first > > blue area containing the jspwiki logo, so that the page title and > > breadcrumbs appear right of the jspwiki logo? > > > > thanks for all the work! > > > > kind regards, > > Harry > > > > > > On 29 July 2015 at 16:32, David Vittor <dvit...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > If anyone is interested in doing some more testing on the haddock > > template, > > > I've updated my wiki to use JSPWiki v2.10.2-svn-28 > > > http://www.digitalspider.com.au/testwiki/ > > > > > > Note: Dirk I've fixed my deployment process, where I was using an old > > > version of haddock.js. This should now be functioning correctly. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > David V > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, David Vittor <dvit...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > Link is here: > > > > http://www.digitalspider.com.au/testwiki/ > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:07 PM, David Vittor <dvit...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi Dirk, > > > >> > > > >> I've managed to update the wiki now so you can test it here. Sorry > for > > > >> the delay. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Dirk Frederickx < > > > >> dirk.frederi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >>> Hi David, > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> Would it be possible to refresh digital spider.com.au/testwiki > with > > > >>> the latest Haddock template ? > > > >>> > > > >>> It would be really helpful to help testing the template on more > > > browsers > > > >>> platforms. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> dirk > > > >>> > > > >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > > >>> From: Dirk Frederickx <dirk.frederi...@gmail.com> > > > >>> Date: Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:42 PM > > > >>> Subject: Re: Haddock template and bugs > > > >>> To: u...@jspwiki.apache.org > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> Dave, all, > > > >>> > > > >>> I just posted a large update of the HADDOCK template. > (2.10.2-svn-17) > > > >>> It stabilises the plain editor, and has many UI improvements. > (more > > > >>> detail in change notes) > > > >>> > > > >>> The HADDOCK template is now close to completion, but needs further > > > >>> hardening. > > > >>> (group related JSPs still need to be done ; and login/preferences > > > needs > > > >>> some more tweaking) > > > >>> > > > >>> I expect to post more documentation during the coming weeks. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> br, > > > >>> dirk > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Dave Koelmeyer < > > > >>> dave.koelme...@davekoelmeyer.co.nz> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On 27/05/15 09:13, Dirk Frederickx wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> Dave, > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Yes, whenever HADDOCK gets more stabilised it's a candidate to > > become > > > >>>>> the > > > >>>>> new default. > > > >>>>> Feedback is much appreciated ! -- plse file your bugs in Jira > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Thanks, and will do :) > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> -- > > > >>>> Dave Koelmeyer > > > >>>> http://blog.davekoelmeyer.co.nz > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
