Great—I've opened an issue for this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-1060
I can prepare a communication to go out in advance advising of any changes needed to jspwiki-custom.properties. +1 on the existing default template name change. Cheers, Dave On 23/07/17 23:27, Harry Metske wrote: > +1 > I am using the haddock template a long time already too. > > Regards, > Harry > > > Op 23 jul. 2017 13:14 schreef "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" < > juanpablo.san...@gmail.com>: > >> Hi, >> >> I would be +1 on that. IMHO then version should be switched to 2.11.0? it >> will most probably imply changes for people with existing default-based >> templates, they should at least specify in jspwiki-custom.properties that >> they want the default template. And re-reading the last sentence, maybe we >> should also rename the default template to clean template or something >> along those lines? >> >> >> br, >> jp >> >> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Dave Koelmeyer < >> dave.koelme...@davekoelmeyer.co.nz> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Apologies if this change has already been made, but if not, what are >>> folks' thoughts about enabling Haddock as the default template for new >>> JSPWiki installations? The plain vanilla template is pretty long in the >>> tooth and certainly doesn't relay a good first impression out of the box. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Dave >>> >>> -- >>> Dave Koelmeyer >>> http://blog.davekoelmeyer.co.nz >>> GPG Key ID: 0x238BFF87 >>> >>> -- Dave Koelmeyer http://blog.davekoelmeyer.co.nz GPG Key ID: 0x238BFF87 The Document Foundation (TDF) member
