It would surely be interesting to see what the performance difference would be.
We could also ditch CachingProvider then probably? And remove some code complexity... Grtz. Harry Op 29 aug. 2017 12:07 a.m. schreef "Jürgen Weber" <juer...@jwi.de>: > Hi, > > ehcache-2.8.3.jar takes about a third of the JSPWiki.war size. > > Is it worth it? > > As for Filesystem page providers, the OS filesystem satisfies all caching > needs. > > ehCaching is only useful for DB or the Subversion providers, but who uses > them? > > As for caching rendered pages, this only works for non-dynamic pages > (i.e. no CurrentTimePlugin). > > And I doubt, that even for static wiki pages, caching has an advantage > on modern cpus. > > Greetings, > Jürgen >
