Hi!

I've just pushed 3.0.1-git-02, which includes
https://github.com/apache/jspwiki/commit/d664299e7 that hopefully
makes the build less flaky. I'm reviewing the PRs now, most of them
are thankfully short enough so I suppose they're ok to go


cheers,
juan pablo

On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 1:18 AM Alex O'Ree <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> ha no idea. they all should build with tests, however the CI setup has
> been flaky
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2026 at 4:41 PM Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alex!
> >
> > tomorrow I'll have some time to begin reviewing PRs / triaging
> > reports, if you have some preferences on which ones should be looked
> > at first I'd be more than happy to start with those
> >
> >
> > cheers,
> > juan pablo
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 6, 2026 at 2:55 PM Alex O'Ree <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > We'll also need to figure out if we want to backport any of this to
> > > 2.X. I'm leaning towards no as the delta between 2 and 3 isn't that
> > > significant
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2026 at 3:16 PM Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Alex!
> > > >
> > > > First Big thanks for all the work, certainly there have been a lot of
> > > > reports. I'll arrive next week and begin reviewing ASAP; anyone else, 
> > > > pmc
> > > > or not, wanting to chime in, please feel free to do so :-)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > juan pablo
> > > >
> > > > El vie, 28 ago 2026, 20:49, Alex O'Ree <[email protected]> escribió:
> > > >
> > > > > Team
> > > > >
> > > > > We've been flooded with security reports. While i was able to apply
> > > > > some of the fixes and PR'd them, not all of them work (i.e. ai
> > > > > generated patches). I could use some help reviewing the PRs and
> > > > > potentially fixing the remaining git patches for the other issues not
> > > > > currently under PR and/or retesting the software after the application
> > > > > of these patches. While none of them should break anything, you never
> > > > > know.
> > > > >

Reply via email to