But there can be builds from other projects too no?

> On Jan 1, 2015, at 19:14, Alex O'Ree <spyhunte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> In addition, the buildbot configs are locked to prevent port conflicts. I.e. 
> only one build at a time per build server
> 
>> On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Alex O'Ree <spyhunte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It's not a port conflict. I think one of the test creates an entity that 
>> other tests depend on and assume are present. Most of the time it works out 
>> ok, but when junit runs the tests in different orders it doesn't guarantee 
>> that that item is present. Just need to track down the order and figure out 
>> what the root cause is 
>> 
>>> On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Kurt Stam <kurt.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The test open a port. Other builds may choose the same port. Currently it 
>>> picks a random port to reduce the chances. Maybe we can change the interval 
>>> it picks a port number from. Do the logs show port conflict errors?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> > On Jan 1, 2015, at 16:13, Alex O'Ree (JIRA) <juddi-...@ws.apache.org> 
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Alex O'Ree created JUDDI-904:
>>> > --------------------------------
>>> >
>>> >             Summary: intermittent test failures
>>> >                 Key: JUDDI-904
>>> >                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JUDDI-904
>>> >             Project: jUDDI
>>> >          Issue Type: Bug
>>> >          Components: uddi-tck
>>> >    Affects Versions: 3.2
>>> >            Reporter: Alex O'Ree
>>> >            Assignee: Alex O'Ree
>>> >             Fix For: 3.3
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > The tck test cases ran as part of the maven build occasionally fails. The 
>>> > root cause is unknown, but it is most likely due to a logic error 
>>> > (failure to clean up some entities) and/or (failure to create required 
>>> > entities for the test). When the tests run, the fire order of junit tests 
>>> > can vary, thus the cause of this issue
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
>>> > (v6.3.4#6332)
> 

Reply via email to