[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13552363#comment-13552363
]
Jay Kreps commented on KAFKA-691:
---------------------------------
Does batching make sense versus just having people increase the timeout?
> Fault tolerance broken with replication factor 1
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-691
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-691
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.8
> Reporter: Jay Kreps
> Assignee: Maxime Brugidou
> Fix For: 0.8
>
> Attachments: KAFKA-691-v1.patch, KAFKA-691-v2.patch
>
>
> In 0.7 if a partition was down we would just send the message elsewhere. This
> meant that the partitioning was really more of a "stickiness" then a hard
> guarantee. This made it impossible to depend on it for partitioned, stateful
> processing.
> In 0.8 when running with replication this should not be a problem generally
> as the partitions are now highly available and fail over to other replicas.
> However in the case of replication factor = 1 no longer really works for most
> cases as now a dead broker will give errors for that broker.
> I am not sure of the best fix. Intuitively I think this is something that
> should be handled by the Partitioner interface. However currently the
> partitioner has no knowledge of which nodes are available. So you could use a
> random partitioner, but that would keep going back to the down node.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
