I agree it is very very low touch since it is only a change when building for publishing and does not affect the jar. I don't have objections and unless anyone else does have objections then I will publish and see maybe we get more errors/issues or 0.8.0-beta1 will be available from maven. I should be able to-do this later tonight or in the morning unless someone has an issue with proceeding.
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Jay Kreps <jay.kr...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's awesome! > > Personally I think it is okay if there is a slight cosmetic difference as > long as we fix it before the proper 0.8 release. > > -Jay > > > On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 6:55 AM, Joe Stein <crypt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > So, I think we have everything now for a successful publishing to maven > > repo for 0.8.0-betaX Kafka build on Scala 2.8.0, 2.8.2, 2.9.1, 2.9.2 > > > > Since I had to make a slight code change > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-963 I am not sure if it is > > proper to officially publish the artifacts since it was not what we voted > > upon technically speaking. > > > > I don't know for sure if when I hit "close" to the staging release to > > promote it to public release if any other errors will come up through the > > process. > > > > My thinking is that we should roll a beta2 release and give the publish > to > > public release another go. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > /* > > Joe Stein > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/charmalloc > > Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop> > > */ > > > -- /* Joe Stein http://www.linkedin.com/in/charmalloc Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop> */
